How does Incentive Affect Kidney Donation Rates: Turkey Case

Yavuz Demirdogen

Abstract


Renal disease is an ongoing and growing problem around the world and in Turkey. Almost %5 of health expenditures are about kidney patients in Turkey. The amount of patients is increasing every day although the donation rates are not increasing in the same speed. The governments are applying different regimes for closing the gap between supply and demand on kidney. These systems are not accurate to close this gap. Main classification of these techniques is opt - in and opt - out regimes. The cost of dialysis for every patient is higher than the cost of transplantation. The transplanted patient lives 22 years whether dialysis patient lives 14 years. Transplantation is cost –effective than dialysis. It is an obligation to decrease the number of patients in the waiting list. In 2014 there are almost 60.000 kidney disease patients in Turkey and 29.000 of them are ESRD patients. Almost 4200 of them are transplanted in 2014. One of the solutions of closing this difference is to pay monetary incentive to possible living donors. Among the ethical debates on monetarizing the human body, this article is focused on the quantity of monetary incentive that would pay to the possible donors. This amount is the collection of the costs of statistical value of life, death-risk component, quality of life component and value of time. It is the quantity of losses, not the value of a kidney. The quantity differs according to the value of statistical life. Average price for these losses are 8.638 TL.

Keywords


ESRD, Monetary incentive, Kidney disease, Kidney transplantation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Becker, G. S., & Elias, J. J. (2007). Introducing incentives in the market for liver and cadaveric organ donations. The Journal of Economic Perspectives : A Journal of the American Economic Association, 21(3), 3–24.

Cohen, Lloyd R. 1989. Increasing the Supply of Transplant Organs: The Virtues of a Futures Market. George Washington Law Review, 58:1–51.

Hansmann, Henry. 1989. The Economics and Ethics of Markets for Human Organs. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 14:57–85.

Peters, Thomas G. 1991. Life of Death: The Issue of Payment in Cadaveric Organ Donation. Journal of the American Medical Association 265(10):1302– 1305.

DeJong, William, Jessica Drachman, Steven L. Gortmaker, Carol Beasley, and Mi chael J. Evanisko. 1995. Options for Increasing Organ Donation: The Po tential Role of Financial Incentives, Standardized Hospital Procedures, and Public Education to Promote Family Discussion. Milbank Quarterly 73:463–479.

Jasper, J. D., C. A. E. Nicherson, J. C. Hershey, and D. A. Asch. 1999. The Pub lic’s Attitudes toward Incentives for Organ Donation. Transplantation Proceedings31:2181–2184.

Robertson, John A. 1999. The Dead Donor Rule. Hastings Center Report 29(6):6–14.

Ubel, Peter A.,Cindy L. Bryce, Laura A. Siminoff, Arthur L. Caplan, and Robert

M. Arnold. 2000. Pennsylvania’s Voluntary Benefits Program: Evaluating an Innovative Proposal for Increasing Organ Donation. Health Af fairs 19(5):206–211.

Sheehy E, Conrad S, Brigham L et al. Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States. N EnglJMed 2003; 349: 667–674.

Hariharan S, Johnson C, Bresnahan B, Taranto S, McIntosh M Stablein. Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. NEJM 2000; 342: 605– 612.

Israni, A. K.,Halpern, S. D., Zink, S., Sidhwani, S. a., & Caplan, A. (2005). Incentive models to increase living kidney donation: Encouraging without co ercing. American Journal of Transplantation, 5(1), 15–20.

Mohamed, E.,&Guella, A. (2013). Public Awareness Survey about Organ Donation and Transplantation. Transplantation Proceedings, 45(10), 3469– 3471.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21533/isjss.v2i1.61

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Yavuz Demirdogen

Inquiry - Sarajevo Journal of Social Sciences is currently Indexed/Abstracted.